Norbert Gombos vs Kalin Ivanovski Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve performance in the last six months slightly favors Gombos, who has secured 47.31% of points compared to Ivanovski's 46.56%. Could this be a subtle advantage?
• In terms of returning an opponent's second serve, Gombos again leads with 47.83%, overshadowing Ivanovski’s 42.89%. Does this suggest Gombos is stronger in returning serves?
• For first serve returns, Ivanovski turns the tables with a 30.25% win rate, while Gombos trails with 26.5%. How significant is this in predicting a match victory?
• Under pressure, during breakpoint situations, Gombos saves 51.02% while Ivanovski has a success rate of 48.98%, hinting at Gombos' greater resilience.
• Overall match win rates over the past year are 50% for Ivanovski and 60.29% for Gombos, indicating Gombos has been more consistent.
• On different surfaces, Ivanovski excels on hard courts with a 62% win rate, whereas Gombos thrives on clay at 59%. Does surface type influence this matchup?
• Both players win 50% of deciding set matches. Consequently, if the match extends to a deciding set, it remains evenly matched based on past performance.
• Gombos’ breakpoint conversion rate at 38.5% is superior to Ivanovski’s 30.21%, potentially giving Gombos the edge when critical opportunities arise.
• In tournament levels, Ivanovski largely competes in Futures/ITF events and wins 66.67%, while Gombos primarily plays in Challenger-level events, winning 60.66% over the past year. Is Gombos acclimatized to higher competitive standards?
• Analyzing opponent quality, Ivanovski contests against athletes with an average rank of 331.8, whereas Gombos faces opponents averaging a rank of 378.44, possibly highlighting Ivanovski’s stiffer competition.

Editorial Prediction (June 16, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing various performance metrics, Gombos holds subtle advantages in second serve points and breakpoint conversions, suggesting critical aspects of his gameplay could outshine Ivanovski in these situations.

Although Ivanovski demonstrates prowess on hard courts, Gombos’ slightly higher win consistency and resilience under breakpoints make him a formidable competitor.

Given the current form and statistics, Gombos appears to have the upper hand in match predictability, suggesting he is likely to emerge as the victor in the upcoming tennis encounter.